If legality and legitimacy are often confused terms, the same applies to illegality and illegality. It may seem that the two concepts refer to the same thing, but in reality this is not the case. On the other hand, if someone is faithful, correct, correct and truthful in the performance of the task and functions for which he is responsible, the legal term is usually used to refer to him. Laws are regulations issued and approved by the competent authorities. These rules prohibit or order certain actions according to a principle of justice and the interest of society as a whole. If something complies with the provisions of the law, it acquires the qualification of the right. If we look in the RAE`s dictionary, which means legitimate, we can check whether it refers to what is legal or just and also in accordance with the law. For example, legitimate power is that which results from the provisions of the Constitution and the organic law of the universal electoral system. We already know that there is a difference between legitimacy and legality, but it is useful to analyze in more detail what is legitimate, what is legal and the legal definition. It is said to be legal for any circumstance that develops in accordance with the law. This type of situation refers to the fact that a particular measure does not conflict with a particular type of legislation of a given country. The test of legality can often be ambiguous, as there are circumstances that give rise to the distinction. However, the various judicial systems that characterize nations are characterized by the establishment of a number of mechanisms that ensure that these possibilities are resolved quickly.

In fact, it should be noted that it is not possible for anyone to invoke a breach of the law. With regard to the constitution and the time limit for requesting legal deposit, the obligated person or entity has two months to deliver the work from one day after notification that a number has been assigned to the proceedings and, in that case, before the sale or distribution of the proceedings. Just for your information, we have listed below some legal terms that you can find. The list is representative – not all terms are included – and not all of these terms can be included in the “language” of your case. Although these are two closely related concepts, they don`t always do so. But apart from these considerations, the truth is that legal acts must be both legal and legitimate. If someone has been hurt by the negligence of a government official or agency, there are special rules for obtaining justice at the federal and state levels. In lawsuits against the state of Florida, for example, the outcome of the first trial must be heard by the highest courts.

Then, a claim received in the form of a declaration of claim is sent to the legislator for approval. This law must be signed by the governor. Legal doctrine is called jurisprudence, that is, the totality consisting of the various judgments of a court. When pronouncing or pronouncing sentences, judges may rely on legal doctrine to justify their decisions. If you want to recognize the trustworthiness and credibility of a person or group within a community, people often refer to them as legal entities. The main difference between legal and legitimate is that legality refers to something that is under a concrete reality, while legitimate is something that goes beyond the legal and is directly related within the person. But this definition may be too abstract, so it`s better to look at it from a more practical point of view. The formal investigation conducted by lawyers and their team of professionals before a trial is called: discovery; These may include different types of information gathering: oral questions from opposing parties, witnesses (see statements); written questions to be answered by the other party under threat of harm (see hearing), written requests for documents, and approvals (where a party admits or rejects key factors).

The investigative process is coordinated by court rules, helps lawyers assess the strengths and weaknesses of the case and gather valuable information before trial. Pain and suffering are among the types of harm for which victims and their families can be rewarded, non-material damage. In the case of personal injury, immaterial damage refers to a prolonged loss of physical and mental health and not to quantitative losses (economic expenses) such as medical expenses, hospital bills, property damage and loss of income due to the death or disability of the income generator. This does not mean that moral prejudice is less important than economic damage. Some lawyers believe that the term “pain and suffering” is not the appropriate term that should be called “human harm” to identify this type of harm. In the field of law, there are concepts that resemble those of non-experts in the field and can even be confused, but they are not really the same. This happens, for example, with legal and legitimate conditions. Based on everything we have seen so far about the legitimate definition, we can conclude that there is no better synonym for this concept than just, although we can also use other terms such as legal, lawful, reasonable, permissible, permitted or true.

We have all heard or heard legal terms on television that are used when a citizen exercises his or her constitutional right to justice. Searcy Denney`s attorneys explain in detail the legal language commonly used when initiating proceedings, filing a lawsuit, negotiating agreements, and/or litigation in court. If the reckless act – or lack of action – of a person, company or entity causes harm to someone, the protagonist of that act may be guilty of negligence under the legal principle. In bringing the action for negligence, the plaintiff must prove that the defendants did not exercise the conduct or care that can reasonably be expected in these circumstances and that they caused the accident or incident that caused the plaintiff`s damage or loss. State and federal laws govern the creation and ownership of intellectual property on works protected by patents, copyrights, and trademarks. This is a specialized area of law practiced by lawyers who are dedicated to seeking justice for those whose works have been copied, plagiarized or otherwise stolen for an illegal purpose of profit or profit. Everything that is legal tries to guarantee a healthy coexistence, based on the ethical and moral concepts that prevail in each society. In this way, conduct that violates the provisions of the law is classified as illegal and is punishable at the administrative or even criminal level. The importance of legitimacy and legality always go hand in hand.

These are two qualities that do not always occur in relation to the same problem. The fact that a certain type of procedure is considered legal implies that it is trivial according to the parameters dictated by a company in its laws. This means that it complies with the minimum cohabitation requirements, which have been planned in advance. However, as mentioned earlier, it is always possible to refer to situations that are in gray areas. Not everything that is legal is always legitimate and not everything that is legitimate is always legal. For example, discrimination against certain groups is legal in some countries, but we can conclude that, according to our ethics and morals, it is not legitimate for us. On the contrary, it might seem legitimate to us to convict a criminal who caused the premeditated death of a person for forced labour (it seems fair to us to pay for what he did), but it would not be legal.